From 5da1746d464d0f01e5e0f0975d53ce508b2c0828 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: pohlig Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2016 19:21:44 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Update 07.usfm --- 59-HEB/07.usfm | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/59-HEB/07.usfm b/59-HEB/07.usfm index 016f99b9..b4b2298c 100644 --- a/59-HEB/07.usfm +++ b/59-HEB/07.usfm @@ -10,18 +10,18 @@ \s5 \p \v 4 See how great this man was. Our ancestor Abraham gave a tenth of the things that he had taken in battle. -\v 5 And indeed, Levi's descendants who receive the priest's office have a command from the law to collect tithes from the people, that is, from their fellow Israelites, even though they, too, are descended from Abraham. -\v 6 But Melchizedek, who was not a descendant from Levi, received tithes from Abraham, and blessed him, the one who had the promises. +\v 5 On one hand, those of Levi's sons who receive the priest's office have a command from the law to collect tithes from the people, that is, from their brothers, even though they, too, have come from Abraham's body. +\v 6 But on the other hand, Melchizedek, whose desendance was not traced from them, received tithes from Abraham, and blessed him, the one who had the promises. \s5 \v 7 There is no denying that the lesser person is blessed by the greater person. -\v 8 In this case men who receive tithes will die one day, but in the other case the one who received Abraham's tithe is described as living on. +\v 8 On one hand, men who receive tithes will die one day. But on the other hand, the one who received Abraham's tithe is testified as living on. \v 9 And, in a manner of speaking, Levi, who received tithes, also paid tithes through Abraham, -\v 10 because Levi was in the private parts of his ancestor Abraham when Melchizedek met Abraham. +\v 10 because Levi was in the body of his ancestor when Melchizedek met Abraham. \s5 \p -\v 11 Now if perfection were possible through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the order of Melchizedek, and not be named after the order of Aaron? +\v 11 Now if perfection were possible through the Levitical priesthood (for under it the people received the law), what further need was there for another priest to arise after the manner of Melchizedek, and not be named after the manner of Aaron? \v 12 For when the priesthood is changed, the law must also be changed. \s5