diff --git a/tn_GAL.tsv b/tn_GAL.tsv
index 2d44a0255f..86d9f2b544 100644
--- a/tn_GAL.tsv
+++ b/tn_GAL.tsv
@@ -567,7 +567,7 @@ front:intro	i6u9				0	# Introduction to Galatians\n\n## Part 1: General Introduc
 4:15	paah		rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-words-phrases	γὰρ	1	Here, the word **For** introduces information which proves how the Galatians had previously felt about Paul. Use a natural form in your language for introducing this material. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-words-phrases]])
 4:15	ogmb		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-hypo	εἰ δυνατὸν τοὺς ὀφθαλμοὺς ὑμῶν ἐξορύξαντες, ἐδώκατέ μοι	1	Paul is using a hypothetical situation to help his readers remember the way that they formerly felt and thought about Paul. Use the natural form in your language for expressing a hypothetical situation. Alternate translation: “if it were possible that you could have torn out your eyes and then given them to me, you would have done so” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-hypo]])
 4:15	o5tg		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-ellipsis	εἰ δυνατὸν	1	Paul is leaving out some of the words that a sentence would need in many languages to be complete. If your readers might misunderstand this, you could supply these words from the context. Alternate translation: “if it were possible for you to do so” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-ellipsis]])
-4:15	wyyt		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-idiom	εἰ δυνατὸν τοὺς ὀφθαλμοὺς ὑμῶν ἐξορύξαντες, ἐδώκατέ μοι	1	The phrase **having torn out your eyes, you would have given them to me** could: (1) be an idiom indicating the great love and devotion which the Galatians formerly had for Paul. In Paul’s time the eyes were considered a person’s most precious possession so if it were possible for a person to take out their eyes and give them to another person this would be a sign of extreme devotion and love towards the person to whom they were given. If your readers would not understand this, you could use an equivalent idiom or use plain language. Alternate translation: “you formerly loved me very much and would have given me your most valued possession to show me your love” (2) indicate that Paul had some type of eye disease and by Paul saying this here he is indicating the great concern which the Galatians had formerly shown for him in relation to the eye disease. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-idiom]])
+4:15	wyyt		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-idiom	εἰ δυνατὸν τοὺς ὀφθαλμοὺς ὑμῶν ἐξορύξαντες, ἐδώκατέ μοι	1	The phrase **having torn out your eyes, you would have given them to me** could: (1) be an idiom indicating the great love and devotion which the Galatians formerly had for Paul. In Paul’s time the eyes were considered a person’s most precious possession so if it were possible for a person to take out their eyes and give them to another person this would be a sign of extreme devotion and love towards the person to whom they were given. If your readers would not understand this, you could use an equivalent idiom or use plain language. Alternate translation: “you formerly loved me very much and would have given me your most valued possession to show me your love” (2) indicate that Paul had some type of eye disease and by Paul saying this here he is indicating the great concern which the Galatians had formerly shown for him regarding the eye disease. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-idiom]])
 4:16	i73s		rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-logic-result	ὥστε	1	Paul is using the phrase **So then** to introduce a reason-result clause in which **speaking truth** to the Galatians is the reason, and them acting as if Paul were their **enemy** is the result. Use a natural way in your language for introducing a reason-result clause. Alternate translation: “Therefore” or “Therefore, as a result of” or “So then, as a result of” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-logic-result]])
 4:16	zznv		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion	ἐχθρὸς ὑμῶν γέγονα, ἀληθεύων ὑμῖν	1	The phrase **speaking truth to you, have I become your enemy** could be: (1) a rhetorical question in which Paul is not asking for information, but is using the question form to show the Galatian believers his disappointment with them and in order to cause them to think about what he is saying. If you would not use a rhetorical question for this purpose in your language, you could translate his words as a statement or an exclamation and communicate the emphasis in another way as modeled by the UST. (2) a statement in which Paul is telling the Galatians that based on the way they are acting it seems as if he has now become their enemy by telling them the truth. Alternate translation: “as a result of my speaking the truth to you, you are acting as if I have become your enemy” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
 4:16	mhkl		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns	ἀληθεύων ὑμῖν	1	If your language does not use an abstract noun for the idea of **truth**, you could express the same idea with an adjective such as “true”, or you could express the meaning in some other way that is natural in your language. Alternate translation: “by telling you things that are true” or Alternate translation: “because I have told you what is true” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])