Edit 'tn_GAL.tsv' using 'tc-create-app'

tn_GAL.tsv

@@ -66,11 +66,11 @@ front:intro	i6u9				0	# Introduction to Galatians\n\n## Part 1: General Introduc
 1:11	o5cu		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive	τὸ εὐαγγελισθὲν ὑπ’ ἐμοῦ	1	If your language does not use the passive form in this way, you can state this in active form or in another way that is natural in your language. Alternate translation: “that I proclaimed” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])
 1:11	hew1		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-gendernotations	ὅτι οὐκ ἔστιν κατὰ ἄνθρωπον	1	Although the term **man** is masculine, Paul is using the word here in a generic sense that includes both men and women, and refers to “humans.” Alternate translation: “did not come from a human” or “is not a human message” or “is not a message that people made up” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-gendernotations]])
 1:12	zfxj		rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-words-phrases	γὰρ	1	Here, the word **For** could be being used to introduce: (1) the grounds or basis for Paul’s assertion in [1:11](../01/11.md), in which case what follows the word **For** is being used as support for what Paul said in [1:11](../01/11.md). Use a form that would be natural for introducing a statement which gives supporting evidence. Alternate translation: “In support of my claim that the gospel I proclaimed is not according to man, I want you to know that” (2) a statement which explains and builds on Paul’s assertion in [1:11](../01/11.md). Use a form that would be natural for introducing a statement which further clarifies and explains a prior statement. Alternate translation: “To explain further, I want you to know” or “That is” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-words-phrases]])
-1:12	kdol		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism	οὐδὲ & ἐγὼ παρὰ ἀνθρώπου παρέλαβον αὐτό, οὔτε ἐδιδάχθην	1	The phrase **I did not receive it from man** and the phrase **nor was I taught it** mean basically the same thing. If saying the same thing twice might confuse your readers, you can combine the two phrases into one. Alternate translation: “I did not receive the gospel that I proclaim from any person” or “no human being taught me the gospel that I proclaim” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism]])
-1:12	er9c		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-gendernotations	ἀνθρώπου	1	Although the term **man** is masculine, Paul is using the word here in a generic sense that includes both men and women, and refers to “humans.” See how you translated the word **man** in [1:11](../01/11.md) where it is used with a similar meaning. Alternate translation: “people” or “humans” or “a human source” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-gendernotations]])
+1:12	kdol		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism	οὐδὲ & ἐγὼ παρὰ ἀνθρώπου παρέλαβον αὐτό, οὔτε ἐδιδάχθην	1	The phrase **I did not receive it from man** and the phrase **nor was I taught it** mean basically the same thing. If saying the same thing twice might confuse your readers, you can combine the two phrases into one. Alternate translation: “I did not receive the gospel that I proclaim from any person” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism]])
+1:12	er9c		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-gendernotations	ἀνθρώπου	1	Although the term **man** is masculine, Paul is using the word here in a generic sense that includes both men and women and refers to “humans.” See how you translated the word **man** in [1:11](../01/11.md) where it is used with a similar meaning. Alternate translation: “people” or “humans” or “a human source” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-gendernotations]])
 1:12	y2am		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive	ἐδιδάχθην	1	If your language does not use the passive form in this way, you can state this in active form, as modeled by the UST, or in another way that is natural in your language. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-activepassive]])
-1:12	hlg6		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit	αὐτό & ἐδιδάχθην	1	Here, both occurrences of the word **it** refer back to “the gospel” which Paul “proclaimed” which he mentioned in [1:11](../01/11.md). If it would help your readers, you could express that explicitly. Alternate translation: “the gospel that I proclaimed … was I taught the gospel that I proclaimed” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])
-1:12	qohz		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-ellipsis	ἐδιδάχθην	1	Paul is leaving out some of the words that a sentence would need in many languages to be complete. If your readers might misunderstand this, you could supply these words from the context. Alternate translation: “was I taught it by any person” or “was I taught it by man” or “was I taught it by a human being” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-ellipsis]])
+1:12	hlg6		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit	αὐτό & ἐδιδάχθην	1	Here, both occurrences of the word **it** refer back to “the gospel” which Paul “proclaimed” which he mentioned in [1:11](../01/11.md). If it would help your readers, you could express that explicitly. Alternate translation: “the gospel that I proclaimed … did I gain the gospel by the teaching of man” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])
+1:12	qohz		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-ellipsis	ἐδιδάχθην	1	Paul is leaving out some of the words that a sentence would need in many languages to be complete. If it would be helpful in your language, you could supply these words from the context. Alternate translation: “was I taught it by any person” or “was I taught it by man” or “was I taught it by a human being” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-ellipsis]])
 1:12	g1o6		rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-logic-contrast	ἀλλὰ	1	What follows the word **but** is in contrast to the phrases **receive it from man** and **taught it**. In contrast to Paul receiving the message he proclaimed from a human source or being **taught it** Paul received it from a divine source. Use a natural way in your language for introducing a contrast. Alternate translation: “rather” or “instead” (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-logic-contrast]])
 1:12	leqs			δι’	1	Alternate translation: “through a”
 1:12	uybt		rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns	ἀποκαλύψεως	1	If your language does not use an abstract noun for the idea of **revelation**, you could express the same idea with a verb such as “revealed,” as modeled by the UST, or you could express the meaning in some other way that is natural in your language. (See: [[rc://*/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])