diff --git a/en_tn_47-1CO.tsv b/en_tn_47-1CO.tsv
index c789bace30..cb7239dc9e 100644
--- a/en_tn_47-1CO.tsv
+++ b/en_tn_47-1CO.tsv
@@ -1954,7 +1954,7 @@ Book	Chapter	Verse	ID	SupportReference	OrigQuote	Occurrence	GLQuote	OccurrenceNo
 1CO	14	26	m04v	figs-parallelism	ψαλμὸν ἔχει, διδαχὴν ἔχει, ἀποκάλυψιν ἔχει, γλῶσσαν ἔχει, ἑρμηνίαν ἔχει	1	What is tp be then, brothers?	Here Paul repeats **has** in order to emphasize any believer might “have” any of these things **when you come together**. If your readers would misunderstand why Paul repeats **has**, you could use another form that indicates that any person might have any of these things. Alternate translation: “has a psalm, or a teaching, or a revelation, or a tongue, or an interpretation” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism]])
 1CO	14	26	qsx0	figs-abstractnouns	ψαλμὸν ἔχει, διδαχὴν ἔχει, ἀποκάλυψιν ἔχει, γλῶσσαν ἔχει, ἑρμηνίαν ἔχει	1	What is tp be then, brothers?	If your language does not use abstract nouns for the ideas behind **revelation** or **interpretation**, you could express the ideas by using verbs such as “reveal” and “interpret.” If you do, you may need to translate all the items in the list with verbal phrases. Alternate translation: “sings a psalm, instructs, explains something that was secret, speaks in a tongue, or interprets a tongue” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])
 1CO	14	26	dy8d	figs-explicit	ἑρμηνίαν	1	What is tp be then, brothers?	Here, just as in [12:10](../12/10.md), **interpretation** refers specifically to interpreting **a tongue**. If your readers would misunderstand what the **interpretation** is about, you could state explicitly that it is an **interpretation** of a **tongue**. Alternate translation: “an interpretation of a tongue” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])
-1CO	14	26	xzz2	figs-imperative	πάντα πρὸς οἰκοδομὴν γινέσθω	1	interpretation	
+1CO	14	26	xzz2	figs-imperative	πάντα πρὸς οἰκοδομὴν γινέσθω	1	interpretation	Here Paul uses a third person imperative. If you have third person imperatives in your language, you could use one here. If you do not have third person imperatives, you could express the idea using a word such as “should” or “must.” Alternate translation: “All things must happen for building up” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-imperative]])
 1CO	14	26	fnba	figs-metaphor	πρὸς οἰκοδομὴν	1	interpretation	
 1CO	14	26	jvgw	figs-explicit	πρὸς οἰκοδομὴν	1	interpretation	
 1CO	14	27	wc1z		καὶ ἀνὰ μέρος	1	and each one in turn	“and they should speak one after another” or “and they should speak one at a time”