Edit 'en_tn_46-ROM.tsv' using 'tc-create-app'

en_tn_46-ROM.tsv

@@ -1923,8 +1923,9 @@ ROM	10	17	aunq	figs-abstractnouns	ῥήματος 	1	hearing by the word of Chri
 ROM	10	18	a8bk	grammar-connect-logic-contrast	ἀλλὰ 	1	hearing by the word of Christ	**But** here indicates that what follows is in contrast to what Paul said in the previous verse. Use a natural way in your language for introducing a contrast. Alternate translation: “By contrast” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-logic-contrast]])
 ROM	10	18	teco	writing-pronouns	λέγω	1	But I say, “Did they not hear?” Yes, most certainly	The pronoun **I** here refers to Paul. If this might confuse your readers, you could say this explicitly. Alternate translation: “I, Paul, say” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/writing-pronouns]])\n
 ROM	10	18	f6jy	figs-rquestion	μὴ οὐκ ἤκουσαν?	1	But I say, “Did they not hear?” Yes, most certainly	Paul is not asking for information, but is using the question form here to emphasize the truth of what he is saying. If you would not use a rhetorical question for this purpose in your language, you could translate his words as a statement or an exclamation and communicate the emphasis in another way. Alternate translation: “They most surely heard!” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
-ROM	10	18	zux3	figs-explicit	μὴ οὐκ ἤκουσαν	1	But I say, “Did they not hear?” Yes, most certainly	See how you translated **hear** in [verse 14](../10/14.md). (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])
 ROM	10	18	djbd	figs-explicit	ἤκουσαν	1	But I say, “Did they not hear?” Yes, most certainly	See how you translated **they** in the previous verse.  (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])
+ROM	10	18	wxxj	figs-doublenegatives	μὴ οὐκ	1	But I say, “Did they not hear?” Yes, most certainly	The phrase **certainly not** translates two negative words in Greek. Paul uses them together to emphasize what he is saying. If your language can use two negatives together for emphasis without them cancelling each other to create a positive meaning, it would be appropriate to use that construction here. (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-doublenegatives]])\n
+ROM	10	18	zux3	figs-explicit	μὴ οὐκ ἤκουσαν	1	But I say, “Did they not hear?” Yes, most certainly	See how you translated **hear** in [verse 14](../10/14.md). (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])
 ROM	10	18	lz77	writing-quotations	εἰς πᾶσαν τὴν γῆν, ἐξῆλθεν ὁ φθόγγος αὐτῶν; καὶ εἰς τὰ πέρατα τῆς οἰκουμένης, τὰ ῥήματα αὐτῶν	1		This sentence is a quotation from an Old Testament book ([Psalm 19:4](../../psa/19/04.md)). If it would be helpful in your language, you could use phrase that indicates that Paul is quoting from an important text. Alternate translation: “David says in the Scriptures,” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/writing-quotations]])\n
 ROM	10	18	tnzy	figs-quotemarks	εἰς πᾶσαν τὴν γῆν, ἐξῆλθεν ὁ φθόγγος αὐτῶν; καὶ εἰς τὰ πέρατα τῆς οἰκουμένης, τὰ ῥήματα αὐτῶν	1	Their sound has gone out into all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world.	In this sentence Paul quotes [Psalm 19:4](../../psa/19/04.md). It may be helpful to your readers to indicate this by setting off all of this material with quotation marks or with whatever punctuation or convention your language uses to indicate a quotation. (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-quotemarks]])\n
 ROM	10	18	s5zh	figs-parallelism	εἰς πᾶσαν τὴν γῆν, ἐξῆλθεν ὁ φθόγγος αὐτῶν; καὶ εἰς τὰ πέρατα τῆς οἰκουμένης, τὰ ῥήματα αὐτῶν	1	Their sound has gone out into all the earth, and their words to the ends of the world.	These two clauses mean the same thing. Paul quotes David saying the same thing twice, in slightly different ways, to emphasize the truth of what he is saying. If saying the same thing twice might be confusing for your readers, you can combine the phrases into one. Alternate translation: “What they said went everywhere in the whole world” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-parallelism]])