Edit 'en_tn_46-ROM.tsv' using 'tc-create-app'

en_tn_46-ROM.tsv

@@ -1922,6 +1922,7 @@ ROM	10	17	nq87	figs-possession	ῥήματος Χριστοῦ	1	hearing by the
 ROM	10	17	aunq	figs-abstractnouns	ῥήματος 	1	hearing by the word of Christ	See how you translated this word in [verse 8](../10/08.md). (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-abstractnouns]])
 ROM	10	18	a8bk	grammar-connect-logic-contrast	ἀλλὰ 	1	hearing by the word of Christ	**But** here indicates that what follows is in contrast to what Paul said in the previous verse. Use a natural way in your language for introducing a contrast. Alternate translation: “By contrast” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-logic-contrast]])
 ROM	10	18	teco	writing-pronouns	λέγω	1	But I say, “Did they not hear?” Yes, most certainly	The pronoun **I** here refers to Paul. If this might confuse your readers, you could say this explicitly. Alternate translation: “I, Paul, say” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/writing-pronouns]])\n
+ROM	10	18	vkvg	figs-quotemarks	μὴ οὐκ ἤκουσαν… εἰς πᾶσαν τὴν γῆν, ἐξῆλθεν ὁ φθόγγος αὐτῶν; καὶ εἰς τὰ πέρατα τῆς οἰκουμένης, τὰ ῥήματα αὐτῶν	1		In these two sentences Paul is quoting himself and the Old Testament. It may be helpful to your readers to indicate this by setting off all of this material with quotation marks or with whatever punctuation or convention your language uses to indicate a quotation. (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-quotemarks]])\n
 ROM	10	18	f6jy	figs-rquestion	μὴ οὐκ ἤκουσαν?	1	But I say, “Did they not hear?” Yes, most certainly	Paul is not asking for information, but is using the question form here to emphasize the truth of what he is saying. If you would not use a rhetorical question for this purpose in your language, you could translate his words as a statement or an exclamation and communicate the emphasis in another way. Alternate translation: “They most surely heard!” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
 ROM	10	18	djbd	figs-explicit	ἤκουσαν	1	But I say, “Did they not hear?” Yes, most certainly	See how you translated **they** in the previous verse.  (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-explicit]])
 ROM	10	18	wxxj	figs-doublenegatives	μὴ οὐκ	1	But I say, “Did they not hear?” Yes, most certainly	The phrase **certainly not** translates two negative words in Greek. Paul uses them together to emphasize what he is saying. If your language can use two negatives together for emphasis without them cancelling each other to create a positive meaning, it would be appropriate to use that construction here. (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-doublenegatives]])\n
@@ -1933,6 +1934,7 @@ ROM	10	18	g4vd	figs-personification	εἰς πᾶσαν τὴν γῆν, ἐξ
 ROM	10	18	e2nx	figs-idiom	τὰ πέρατα τῆς οἰκουμένης	1		This is an idiom that refers to everywhere people live on the earth. If it would be helpful in your language, you could express the meaning plainly. Alternate translation: “everywhere on the earth” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-idiom]])\n
 ROM	10	19	n3q8	grammar-connect-words-phrases	ἀλλὰ 	1		**But** here indicates that what follows is in contrast to what Paul said [verse 17](../10/17.md) and also agrees with the statement in the previous verse. If it would be clearer in your language, you could use an expression that shows the agreement between this verse and the previous verse. Alternate translation: “Furthermore,” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/grammar-connect-words-phrases]])
 ROM	10	19	uu9g	writing-pronouns	λέγω	1		The pronoun **I** here refers to Paul. If this might confuse your readers, you could say this explicitly. Alternate translation: “I, Paul, say” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/writing-pronouns]])
+ROM	10	19	imik	figs-quotemarks	μὴ Ἰσραὴλ οὐκ ἔγνω…ἐγὼ παραζηλώσω ὑμᾶς, ἐπ’ οὐκ ἔθνει, ἐπ’ ἔθνει ἀσυνέτῳ, παροργιῶ ὑμᾶς	1		In these two sentences Paul is quoting himself and the Old Testament. It may be helpful to your readers to indicate this by setting off all of this material with quotation marks or with whatever punctuation or convention your language uses to indicate a quotation. (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-quotemarks]])
 ROM	10	19	ib4m	figs-rquestion	μὴ Ἰσραὴλ οὐκ ἔγνω?	1	Moreover, I say, “Did Israel not know?”	Paul is not asking for information, but is using the question form here to emphasize the truth of what he is saying. If you would not use a rhetorical question for this purpose in your language, you could translate his words as a statement or an exclamation and communicate the emphasis in another way. Alternate translation: “Israel most surely knew!” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-rquestion]])
 ROM	10	19	zyw0	figs-metonymy	Ἰσραὴλ	1		The word **Israel** is a metonym for the people who lived in the nation of Israel. Alternate translation: “Again I tell you the people of Israel did know the message” (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-metonymy]])
 ROM	10	19	dkcp	figs-doublenegatives	μὴ…οὐκ	1		The phrase **certainly not** translates two negative words in Greek. Paul uses them together to emphasize what he is saying. If your language can use two negatives together for emphasis without them cancelling each other to create a positive meaning, it would be appropriate to use that construction here. (See: [[rc://en/ta/man/translate/figs-doublenegatives]])